Posts

Showing posts from October, 2023

INTERVIEWING THE IMPOSTER - Sister Lucy Truth. The Big Zugibe Mistake. Dr. Zugibe tells us that Carlos Evaristo, after interviewing "Sister Lucy," came out saying that this was NOT the real Sister Lucy and then he went to the Portuguese police.

Image

Hello? Now the Modernist Counterfeit Church of Universal Salvationism would have us pray for demons. This is why they needed a Fake Sister Lucy. The real one would not have gone along with ANY OF IT!

Image
https://novusordowatch.org/2023/10/synod-spirituality-on-fire-for-demons-and-reptiles/

Padre Gregory Hesse On Fr. Jose Marie Escriva, the Founder of Opus Dei. Was he humble like a true saint needs to be?

Image

"Lucy's Enemies". She was under attack from the very beginning.

Image

The Fatima Cash Cow

Image

"Profiles Of The Two Lucys of Fatima". When are we going to move on from the question "If?" and start addressing the "How?" We pretty much know the "Why?" Now it has become so clear, it takes intentional blindness NOT to see it.

Image

Archbishop Viganò - An Unprecedented Apostasy. Vigano goes Sedevacantist and Ends Up Pointing the Finger at Vatican II. It Seems as if the Institutional Church and the Institutional State are Falling into Some Serious Mayhem.

Image

I wonder what an honest assessment of the reports gathered by Sister Lucy Truth would have done for the reputation of Church Militant? IHow wonderful it would have been if they would have helped us move on to actually finding out what happened to Sister Lucy. But their masters said no!

Image
                                            

Fałszywa siostra Łucja i jej operatorka. Interesting video from Poland. Turn on the cc. and watch the actions of the nun who was always with "Sister Lucy."

Image

My brief reply to Robert Sungenis' Flip Flop on the Evidence Indicating the Imposture of Sister Lucy dos Santos. Can a "man of science" flip based on Christine Niles utterly ridiculous analysis of experts reports?

Image
@RSungenis 2 months ago Christine, very good report! You covered a lot, and you did it very well. I know you are a good investigator from watching your other investigations, but I could easily see that you put even more effort into the investigation of Sr. Lucy. I was one who was more or less persuaded by Chojowski’s evidence, but you should it was mostly subjective, that is, he wanted there to be two different Lucy’s, and his dismissal of the Ideal Innovations report was most telling. One reason for Chojnowski’s bias in viewing the evidence is because he is a sedevacantist (the same as the Dimond brothers who think there is a fake Sr. Lucy). They want the Vatican to be sinister on everything so that they can justify their leaving the Church. Incidentally, the one thing you showed that really stood out, which neither Chojnowski nor the experts showed or even mentioned, was the angle of the camera! It makes all the difference. How anyone, claiming to be an expert, can make conclusions w

"There Was Only One Imposter Lucy" - Sister Lucy Truth

Image