Third Secret Discovered? Compelling evidence supports discovery of the text of the Third Secret.

Just in time for the anniversary of the giving of the Third Secret  by Our Lady to the Three Children of Fatima, the website Tradition in Action has come forward with a text, subsequently verified for its authenticity by a expert handwriting analyst --- based upon Sister Lucy's writing out of the First and Second Secrets, which we know to be authentic --- which claims to be that of the Third Secret --- dealing with the apostasy in the Church.
This is an incredible find, if it proves to be authentic. It clearly speaks of an antipope and an counterfeit church. It also speaks of the importance which Fatima would have for the faithful Catholic in the 20th and 21st centuries.
It is interesting that "church of hell" seemingly described by Sister Lucy should almost exactly resemble the new church built at the Shrine of Fatima.

This also fits in perfectly well with what Fr. Nicholas Gruner always told me in private with regard to the Third Secret, he would always repeat the words of Cardinal Ciappi, who had actually seen the text of the Third Secret, that "the Apostasy in the Church will come from the very top."



http://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B352_Secret.html

Here is TIA translation of the text. The entire article can be accessed at the web address above.

Tuy September 1, 1944 or April 1, 1944

JMJ

Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church!

Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the 'holy Father' in front of a multitude that was cheering him.

But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil.

Then, after some moments we saw the same Pope entering a Church, but this Church was the Church of hell; there is no way to describe the ugliness of that place. It looked like a gray cement fortress with broken angles and windows similar to eyes; it had a beak in the roof of the building.

Next, we raised our eyes to Our Lady who said to us: You saw the apostasy in the Church; this letter can be opened by the holy Father, but it must be announced after Pius XII and before 1960.

In the kingdom of John Paul II the cornerstone of Peter's grave must be removed and transferred to Fatima.

Because the dogma of the faith is not conserved in Rome, its authority will be removed and delivered to Fatima.

The cathedral of Rome must be destroyed and a new one built in Fatima.

If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed.

Our Lady told us that this is written,[in] Daniel 9:24-25 and Matthew 21:42-44

Comments

  1. Thank you for this text. Is there a way to understand the very last sentence of Our Lady's warning? That is, "If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed" What is precisely is meant by "after this order is announced"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's possible that the message will not be as it appears on the circled photo copied sheet of paper. If you wish to - best go to the Tradition in Action website for an explanation.
      http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g33ht_Decipher.htm

      Regarding the prophecy of the 69 weeks, I believe this statement should appear elsewhere in the text - due to it referring (in Daniel chapter 9) to a long term prophecy that there will come a period of 69 weeks of years commencing at the Order commanding the rebuilding of Rome (Given by Pope Nicholas V in 1447) followed by a period of nearly 500 years elapsing prior to the returning of Christ. The exact same fulfilment of a prophecy given during the Old Testament regarding the countdown from an Order given for the rebuilding of Jerusalem.

      It's a bit complicated but further information regarding the 69 weeks prophecy in Daniel has been very well explained on these links.

      https://www.maccabeanuprising.com/daniel-9-24-70-weeks-years-prophecy/
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL1PZliNNhI

      As to the 3rd Secret document. It is a photocopy. Tradition in Action, at the link above believe that an error has been made - It seems a former third Secret (letter) of Sr Lucy has been photocopied, and then certain statements cut and pasted to disguise the true import of the alleged 3rd Secret and then rephotocopied. Go to the TIA link above and you will see.

      God Bless - May the Lord Jesus return SOON!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Amazon Facial Recognition Technology Determines that Sister Lucy I and Sister Lucy II are not the Same Person. Not One Match Amidst Thousands of Comparisons.

Sister Lucy Truth Update: Michigan State Facial Recognition Lab Finds that Sister Lucy II (post-1967) was NOT Sister Lucy I (pre-1967). How Much Do We Need to Put Out Until the Crickets Stop Chirping?

More Than Metaphor: Our Lady at La Salette seems to have told us not only THAT the Church would be in "Eclipse," but WHEN IT WOULD GO INTO ECLIPSE, October 27th, 1958.

Long-Standing Fatima "Consecration of Russia" Narrative Implodes as Handwriting Expert Demonstrates 1980 Letter from "Sister Lucy" to Fr. Umberto Pasquale is Definitely a Forgery. Whatever the Real Sister Lucy Knew about the Requested Consecration of Russia DOES NOT Appear in this Letter. Fatima Center, Are You Listening? Report from Bart Baggett to be Posted Imminently.

ALERT: World-Class Handwriting Analyst Demonstrates that the Writings of "Sister Lucy" from after 1957 Were Forgeries. Analysis of "Third Secret" Released by Vatican in 2000, Forged 1969 Letter Urging Obedience and Submission to Paul VI, Signatures on Letters from 1967 and 1969, Letter about Consecration of Russia From 1980, and Manuscript Released by Carmelites of Coimbra and Used as the Basis for Sister Lucy's Official Biography Published by the Blue Army WERE ALL FORGERIES. Follow the Links to the Sworn Testimony Below.

Revised and Updated Edition of Handwriting Analyst Declaration in which 1969 Letter of "Sister Lucy" Advocating Submission to Paul VI is Proven to be a Forgery. Soon to be Released on SisterLucyimposter.org. Includes Analysis of the Purported Third Secret Released in 2000. Socci's "4th Secret" Looking More Plausible. Folks, if Sister Lucy was around in 1969, she would have been able to write her own letters.