Third Secret Discovered? Compelling evidence supports discovery of the text of the Third Secret.

Just in time for the anniversary of the giving of the Third Secret  by Our Lady to the Three Children of Fatima, the website Tradition in Action has come forward with a text, subsequently verified for its authenticity by a expert handwriting analyst --- based upon Sister Lucy's writing out of the First and Second Secrets, which we know to be authentic --- which claims to be that of the Third Secret --- dealing with the apostasy in the Church.
This is an incredible find, if it proves to be authentic. It clearly speaks of an antipope and an counterfeit church. It also speaks of the importance which Fatima would have for the faithful Catholic in the 20th and 21st centuries.
It is interesting that "church of hell" seemingly described by Sister Lucy should almost exactly resemble the new church built at the Shrine of Fatima.

This also fits in perfectly well with what Fr. Nicholas Gruner always told me in private with regard to the Third Secret, he would always repeat the words of Cardinal Ciappi, who had actually seen the text of the Third Secret, that "the Apostasy in the Church will come from the very top."



http://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B352_Secret.html

Here is TIA translation of the text. The entire article can be accessed at the web address above.

Tuy September 1, 1944 or April 1, 1944

JMJ

Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church!

Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the 'holy Father' in front of a multitude that was cheering him.

But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil.

Then, after some moments we saw the same Pope entering a Church, but this Church was the Church of hell; there is no way to describe the ugliness of that place. It looked like a gray cement fortress with broken angles and windows similar to eyes; it had a beak in the roof of the building.

Next, we raised our eyes to Our Lady who said to us: You saw the apostasy in the Church; this letter can be opened by the holy Father, but it must be announced after Pius XII and before 1960.

In the kingdom of John Paul II the cornerstone of Peter's grave must be removed and transferred to Fatima.

Because the dogma of the faith is not conserved in Rome, its authority will be removed and delivered to Fatima.

The cathedral of Rome must be destroyed and a new one built in Fatima.

If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed.

Our Lady told us that this is written,[in] Daniel 9:24-25 and Matthew 21:42-44

Comments

  1. Thank you for this text. Is there a way to understand the very last sentence of Our Lady's warning? That is, "If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed" What is precisely is meant by "after this order is announced"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's possible that the message will not be as it appears on the circled photo copied sheet of paper. If you wish to - best go to the Tradition in Action website for an explanation.
      http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/g33ht_Decipher.htm

      Regarding the prophecy of the 69 weeks, I believe this statement should appear elsewhere in the text - due to it referring (in Daniel chapter 9) to a long term prophecy that there will come a period of 69 weeks of years commencing at the Order commanding the rebuilding of Rome (Given by Pope Nicholas V in 1447) followed by a period of nearly 500 years elapsing prior to the returning of Christ. The exact same fulfilment of a prophecy given during the Old Testament regarding the countdown from an Order given for the rebuilding of Jerusalem.

      It's a bit complicated but further information regarding the 69 weeks prophecy in Daniel has been very well explained on these links.

      https://www.maccabeanuprising.com/daniel-9-24-70-weeks-years-prophecy/
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL1PZliNNhI

      As to the 3rd Secret document. It is a photocopy. Tradition in Action, at the link above believe that an error has been made - It seems a former third Secret (letter) of Sr Lucy has been photocopied, and then certain statements cut and pasted to disguise the true import of the alleged 3rd Secret and then rephotocopied. Go to the TIA link above and you will see.

      God Bless - May the Lord Jesus return SOON!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Fraud: Facial Recognition Technology With 2,400 Picture Comparisons Shows Sister Lucy I (Pre-1958) and Sister Lucy II (Post-1958) are Definitely NOT the Same Person.

Patience! Sister Lucy Truth Investigation Barrels Forward. New Experts Added to Team With New Information. Facial Recognition and Forensic Report Coming Soon.

It's Romanitas! Duh! Michael Matt Just Needs to Settle Down. Where did you Expect the last two Superior Generals of the SSPX (1982-2018) to be sent? Zimbabwe?

SSPX Defines Itself with Archbishop Lefebvre's 1974 Declaration "Which the Society embraces in its Entirety." Is the Lefebvre Ram back in the Pen and has the Reb[r]anded Wether Been Sent to the Butcher?

St. Robert Bellarmine Waits for the Remnant to Renounce Writer Who Wrote that Cardinals can Depose and Remove a Pope. I don't think that it is mere coincidence that St. Robert Bellermine's Feast Day is May 13th!

In 2009 Interview, Fr. Florian Abrahamowicz Singles out New SSPX Superior as Priest who was "Vehemently Opposed" to Deal with the Conciliar Church. Rejected Idea of Converting Modernists "From Within."

Is this Why they Needed to Get Rid of Sister Lucy and Substitute an Impostor? I wonder what "False Church" Padre Pio was speaking about in 1960? Can't Imagine.

Mama Mia! Mike it's "RAD TRAD THOMIST" Hear Michael Matt Attack RadTrad Thomist and set up a Straw Man Argument in Order to Hide the Fact that the Remnant has sent Authors emails saying that Anyone who Writes for Louie Verrecchio Is BANNED from Writing in the Remnant.